Bill Gates Wrecks Climate Doomers! Is Geoengineering Next?
Bill's pivot, who's funding geoengineering, the geoengineering fail, and Stardust's geoengineering field tests coming in April.
Bill Gates makes major climate change reversal after years of doomerism: ‘People will be able to live and thrive’
“Although climate change will have serious consequences — particularly for people in the poorest countries — it will not lead to humanity’s demise,” he wrote. “People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future.”
He’s taken criticism for flying around the globe to trumpet our impending doom due to climate change in a $70 million private jet that spews around 450 gallons of fuel per hour, a hypocrisy he acknowledges in his post but assures he offsets his own staggering carbon footprint “with legitimate carbon credits.”
Astonishingly, Gates goes so far as to point out that cold — not heat — is a far greater threat to humanity, writing, “surprisingly, excessive cold is far deadlier, killing nearly ten times more people every year than heat does.”
Three tough truths about climate
What I want everyone at COP30 to know. By Bill Gates published on Tuesday, Oct 28, 2025
So I urge everyone at COP30 to ask: How do we make sure aid spending is delivering the greatest possible impact for the most vulnerable people? Is the money designated for climate being spent on the right things?
I believe the answer is no.
Bill believes it’s more important to buy vaccines than invest in the big green scam. Bill’s reversal comes seven days after Richard Lindzen and William Happer appeared on the Joe Rogan podcast:
Climate Facts co2coalition.org
Explore our extensive library of facts and detailed data to empower yourself with knowledge, educate friends and family, and join us in our love for CO2.
Climate Scam: Get Wrekt! Next story:
Senator Mastriano made a direct ask for President Trump to finally put an end to these programs that have been going on for decades, that clearly ramped up in spending under President Biden. In his letter to Secretary Hegseth, Senator Mastriano states that during the Obama-Biden era the Pentagon classified “climate change” as a national security threat — which redirected billions away from combat readiness and into “unproven environmental schemes.” The FY 2023 request for the Department of Defense included $3.1 billion in so-called “climate investment,” much of which he states supports SRM research and atmospheric experimentation. In his letter to Director Vought, the Senator calls SRM “a legacy of wasteful federal spending — a costly experiment that diverts resources from genuine national needs and undermines public confidence in government accountability.”
Apparently, Doug Mastriano didn’t actually read the Department of Defense funding for 2023. There is absolutely nothing related to deploying geoengineering technology in there. Here’s the facts:
The Department recognizes the vital importance of addressing dangerous transboundary threats. The FY 2023 Budget ensures DoD continues its work to combat current and future crises.
Addressing the Climate Crisis ($3.1 billion). Investments include:
Installation Resiliency and Adaptation - $2 billion
Operational Energy and Buying Power - $247 million
Science and Technology - $807 million
Contingency Preparedness - $28 million”
Sources:
May 5, 2022 - Unpacking the Pentagon’s $3.1 Billion Climate Request
March 28, 2022 - The Department of Defense Releases the President’s Fiscal Year 2023 Defense Budget
Senator Mastriano needs to learn some Chemtrail Facts!
So Who’s Really Funding Geoengineering Research, Development, and Deployment?
Two major maps of the Geoengineering Industrial Complex have been available on Weather Modification History’s Geoengineering FAQ page since 2014 and updated on 2018.
Geoengineering, Climate Engineering, and Climate Intervention - WeatherModificationHistory.com/geoengineering/
Surprise, Kevin, and J. P. Sapinski. “Economic interests and ideologies behind solar geoengineering research in the United States.” Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement (2022).
Necheles, Ella, Lizzie Burns, Amy Chang, and David Keith. “Funding for Solar Geoengineering from 2008-2018.” Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program (2018). • DOWNLOAD PDF
Other sources from my video at the top of the page:
May 13, 2025 - SRM Funding Tracker - SRM360
May 14, 2025 - SRM Funding Overview - SRM360
Post by
on X: https://x.com/climateviewer/status/1984062966925521307
NEXT!
The Engineering Failure
At the core of the problem is physics.
The solid particles proposed for stratospheric spraying—calcium carbonate, alumina, titanium dioxide—can’t be aerosolized properly.
The Columbia researchers write:
“Due to the solid aerosol candidates’ high density and small primary particle size, these are classified as Geldart Group C “hard to fluidize” materials, meaning they resist flowing along with a gas as primary particles, instead forming large (several microns) agglomerates. Cohesive intermolecular forces tend to hold primary particles together, and as primary particle sizes decrease, these cohesive forces tend to decrease less significantly than opposing forces in a gas flow, resulting in agglomerates that resist breakup.”
These particles stick together and form heavy clumps instead of spreading into a fine reflective mist.
That means they fall too quickly and fail to scatter sunlight.
The only way to break them apart, the researchers found, would require aircraft equipped with massive high-pressure compression systems.
“High pressure, slower-moving gas is clearly necessary to impart sufficient drag on an agglomerate, indicating the need for some sort of heavy-duty (> 100-fold pressure increase) in-flight air compression system, or the on-board transport of a highly pressurized carrier gas, which may impact economic assessments of costs for injection, as well as potential safety concerns. Additionally, at higher solid mass fractions, Weber numbers near the throat are reduced, a result of the coupled nature of the solid and gas momentum equations, which limits the ability of gas-particle laden systems to reach Mach 1 at the nozzle throat. If such a nozzle dispersal approach were adopted, this may reduce possible solid dispersal rates (as suggested by literature) additionally increasing injection costs by decreasing the total amount of aerosol able to be injected per flight. Estimates for cost of sulfur-based deployments stem nearly entirely from aircraft-related expenses, making such decreases in payload likely to significantly impact costs.”
In other words, the equipment doesn’t exist.
And even if it did, the cost and safety risks would be prohibitive.
Original Source:
Hack, M., McNeill, V. F., Steingart, D., & Wagner, G. (2025). Engineering and logistical concerns add practical limitations to stratospheric aerosol injection strategies. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 34635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20447-2
I first covered Stardust back in January, but they are finally making the MSM news.
The startup would use the money it has raised to begin “outdoor contained experiments” as soon as April, Yedvab told POLITICO. Those tests would release the company’s reflective particles inside a modified plane flying about 11 miles (18 kilometers) above sea level.
The idea, Yedvab explained, is that “instead of displacing the particles out to the stratosphere and start following them, to do the other way around — to suck air from the stratosphere and to conduct in situ experiments, without dispersing essentially.” - Politico
Few outsiders have gotten a glimpse of Stardust’s plans, and the company has not publicly released details about its technology, its business model, or exactly who works at its company. But the company appears to be positioning itself to develop and sell a proprietary geoengineering technology to governments that are considering making modifications to the global climate — acting like a kind of defense contractor for climate alteration. - UnDark
Read More:
Jan 14, 2025 - Israeli Stardust Labs & Geoengineering Governance
Mar 17, 2025 - How One Company Wants to Make Geoengineering Profitable
Oct 24, 2025 - Global cooling startup raises $60M to test sun-reflecting technology
Nov 5, 2025 - Geoengineering startup has been secretly lobbying Congress for months
Connect With ClimateViewer
Check out my websites, Telegram chat, video platforms, social media, and other ways to support my work on connect.climateviewer.com.
Attack Ideas, Not People. ❤️ you, mean it.
And...
That isn't Their goal with that stuff. It's failing miserably on that front and They know it.
Once we all get around to its REAL purpose, and how it's somewhat working, THEN...
We need to hit critical mass of awareness that WAR is being waged directly on us. War on consciousness, if you will.
High time to...
BRING THEM DOWN.
Yesterday was absolutely horrendous in West central CO. Like a big game of poison spreading Shriner drills up there.
Not my idea of a good time.
It's gonna get heavier before it gets LIGHTER. And then the cockroaches are OVER.
Wake up or die! Although we might have to lose at least half of ya to be free and move forward! Probably more like 66-80%.