Is RFK fully familiar with the history of chemtrailing? IF there is any geo-engineering being done surreptitiously by additives to the commercial jet fuel, that is secondary to what has been actively sprayed by non-commercial planes fitted with tanks and spray nozzles, that for over 20 years have been seen causing the X and tic tac to patterns over all regions of the US.
THAT is what the people want ended. He may be correct that DARPA has had a hand in it. But it must stop.
Hi Mary - I encourage you to spend a bit of time learning how to read the atmospheric conditions that are inducive to the trails in the sky on some days & not others.
It is simply not the case that every time you see a line that ‘THEY are spraying poisons’.
It is the case that jet exhaust will become visible under certain conditions at certain altitudes.
Is the jet exhaust non-toxic? Hell no!! But, unless there is a particular project for Insect control or the like taking place, then you are seeing nothing other than the trails of ice crystals formed around particulates of carbon & sulphur & tiny amounts of the things you always here about…Aluminium etc etc that are left behind every jet on every flight every day everywhere.
Like cars & trucks just in the sky.
The problem of the jet fuel is a complex one. That’s probably all I can manage atm. Hope it helped somewhat.
Carbon and sulphur play minor roles in ice nucleation, it's the metals, the toxic metals that are the perfect cirrus seeds. So there is some truth in those that say they are being sprayed with toxic ingredients which rain out on them eventually. Not all has to be added either. All it takes is for the oil majors to NOT refine the jet fuel to the extent they should. If they do that, there is intentionality there.
In theory you are correct however the aviation fuel has VERY strict quality controls for safety as well as other.
I had a friend who was a ground fuel inspector & the controls just for that are extremely strict. Aviation is no different, if anything, even more regulated.
It is the word ‘spraying’ that is often misused but people insist it is a nefarious spraying program.
Aluminum (Al), Barium (Ba), Vanadium (V), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni), Titanium (Ti), Lead (Pb), and Strontium (Sr) all present.
You're asking us to trust the Oil majors in regulating their own product. If they are knowingly putting these toxic metals into the atmosphere, conflict over the term "spraying" versus "spewing" is irrelevant.
I haven’t seen my fuel inspection friend for years but if I remember correctly, the testing was independent but - we know that doesn’t mean foolproof by any means - however not self-regulating but that’s Australia & a while back.
More questions you can have answered in Telegram. Hope to see you there.
I would have to agree, have to include a load of detail to "prove" intent, they've worked to protect themselves with plausible deniability. Hint's on the dates. Begins around 1972 possibly 1968 (still digging on that).
First arf, I’m not a “Mister,” little Miss StellaQ. Learn some manners NOW. And you just wanna smack me without telling me what’s wrong. Either put up or shuttup, and I say that with love and respect.
In a tic tac pattern! Every plane I assume is taking the shortest route from point A to point B. Then why are they crisscrossing the sky? Are they lost, and trying to find their way? The consumption of fuel is enormous, and for no apparent reason, other than to create clouds of some toxic concoction.
Aviation routes are allocated - much like highways in the sky; Skyways.
If conditions are right ALL flights will leave a trail (at the altitude that is conducive). The criss cross patterns are from the trails being moved by wind currents, then another plane, then another… leaving a trail.
When the skyways are at right angles - IE flights running different directions - and the trails are drifting - that’s what causes the grid patterns.
Holding patterns (flights waiting to land) will cause strange loopy patterns.
How can no one know??! There are hundreds of pilots spraying this crap all over the planet. It’s not fuel. Whatever they are doing higher up that we can’t see is causing constant haze and a white /grey sky. Unusual wind, thunder, hail and downpours.
Hazel, where does 'spray' come from ? Where do planes 'spray' - low level herbicide treatments for farms and monoculture for forestry - and well cloud seeders.
SAI - this is out there way up there, it stands for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection = tidbits (aerosols) the planes fart out and create pollution that at the right altitude, moisture, temps in the stratosphere create very long lasting (much longer lasting than lower level contrails - because the stratosphere is not affected by winds and other weather dynamics as lower level troposphere zones - where planes still make white lines (contrails) that may or may not form into a cirrus cloud (manmade = cirrus homegenitus). You may wish to learn some terminology - it truly does help.
Well I’m old and tired and don’t really care about terminology. But I know what a normal sky, clouds and weather is. I’ve watched a beautiful clear blue sky turn toxic haze. There are thousands of pics on X. Weather modification ban just passed in Florida legislature! :) BUT,
Without removing Title 50, § 1520-21 Exceptions clause, the feds can continue to spray any state they want, under the public health emergency (PREP Act) that was just extended to 2029!!
But you are an obvious speculator spectator that runs with the media developed indoctrinations which are run to keep people in fear.
I agree with you Sky Brightening and Toxins in the atmosphere are an ABSOLUTE concern. What you speak of 'permanently white skies' are also of great concern - it's geoengineering that is to reflect the sun away called Solar Radiation Management - this was just approved in the UK recently and well it impacts the whole world! So here is an Indian News article about it - people are concerned!
No state has any right to impact Commercial Air Trading.
I feel your concern is true and you want blue skies again - those of us in the 'older bracket' well remember the very blue skies and very few planes.
Not sure if you know this but first off there are 43 million flights per annum that makes for 150,000 planes PER DAY - that' is one heck of a lot of emissions up there!
There are so many flying now they have had to make Sky Ways - similar to Highways for cars... just look at real time flights on www.flightradar24.com
Some go East West some go North South - and well, they cause lines in the sky and even X's
But what is getting in the way of the 'experts' in the field and I also want you to know is of even more concern is people reactive and not know what they are speaking about and that makes them lose credibility.
You are better off speaking the simplest terms of saying "stop making so much pollution in the sky" or "stop making so many artificial clouds"... The 'experts' will then hear you and know what you mean. Using terminology can otherwise get your message muddled and at best lose your credibility.
I just learned about this from Jim Lee… He da man right now! I think it might be the case ALSO that they just spray us, but he’s pointed out how MANY flights…. wow. crazy. INSANELY crazy. I say let’s bring back TRAINS. They used to be really FANCY and people dressed up to travel on them, like flying used to be when I was a kid… I love trains.
Wondering where you get the concept of spraying jet fuel out of nozzles and tanks - are you talking about videos for ballast testing for safety checks on planes... that was cycling around to ramp up the conspiracy on 'spraying chemtrails' to hype up the FEAR...
Grid patterns are called "sky ways" just like highways for cars and shipping lanes for large shipping vessels.
So what is your theory on this please?
It's always interesting to see someone stand up to someone who's been deep diving into geoengineering for decades and tell them their "theory is wrong" this is interesting.
Please provide your theory with your proof, resources and more content to your claims?
What is the acronym you use "CT" I don't know what that means.
It is called 'accidental geoengineering' which is when an airplane flies at the altitude and the moisture and the temperature conditions that create contrails (condensed chemtrails) that these white lines, when they linger, create manmade clouds = weather modification (accidentally - ooops - by means of creating carbon credits for the airline industries). What needs to happen simple is to clean up the fuel - it was modified by NATO in the 1990's for ease of transport - and it began in the military then due to ease of transport to use military pipeline, commercial flights began using it. ... when people really start to follow the step by step, the problems and the creators begin to come into focus... there are solutions... and one of them is to clean up the fuel!
The fuel may be contaminated (nothing new there, everything is), but this is Not what is responsible, do they fly in grid patterns? Do they target the path of the sun? Do they intentionally produce X's in the sky?Is that from the type of fuel too?
No, this narrative was spun because of the increasing awareness of the public, it's an attempt to derail the truth.
Did you know that old movies have been changed and edited to show chemtrails in the sky in the background? As if it's always been there...
I've been researching it for over 10 years, observing and taking pictures.
I also am aware enough to see orchestrated narrative changes to benefit the parasites. People get threatened, sell out, or some were just plants all along.
Why don't you answer with your proofs and facts instead of attacking the points you're attacking the people.
Attack issues have a respectful conversation... share your research that proves us all wrong, we appreciate when people can point out the facts as they 'should be"...
That's quite a feat since I Aced Physics 1&2. But, I'm sure you know better, and you've read all the peer reviewed journals on contrails and read all the patents on weather modification/ SAI, etc, etc?
Old government docs outlining weather modification
I've been in the game for quite a long time and it's easy to see when new, easy explanations materialize, but don't explain results.
My gut tells me that you are "new", ignorant, or a shill.
I have read over 1,000 peer reviewed studies and over 1,181 patents on weather modification and geoengineering. I have a photographic memory and calling me a shill actually makes you the shill. Ignore (one of) my websites and my work because the truth I'm telling is incovenient for your falsely held beliefs.
yet you still point your finger, call people names and don't provide the answers we ask you for...
exactly who is acting like the shill here?
If you want respect and have a somewhat 'normal' discussion, you need to give it... honestly and for goodness sakes what are you contributing to the discussion...
First of all I think RFK Jr. was very rude to this woman....."is there a question there"? She needed to give a brief background on her question...
Also, I used to work at a major oil refinery where they produced jet fuel....barium, strontium, aluminum, strange living particles, et al are NOT normally in jet fuel...all commercial jet fuel must meet ASTM requirements and every batch shipped is tested in a lab before it is released for sale.....the bad actors in chemtrails are stored in large containers inside the aircraft and the crap is sprayed separately from the contrails created by the jet fuel...there are numerous photos of this online and I'm sure RFK, Jr. knows this....he's just another globalist shill IMO
Not sure what you mean by "voice was different"....do you really think a jet could fly with jet fuel contaminated with the chemicals and biological agents they are finding from chemtrails? the fallout comes from injector nozzles installed on the side of gutted commercial planes fitted with barrels of the spray material?...I still don't trust RFK Jr. any more than I trust creepy Elon Musk...
"sulfur and jet fuel"? He doesn't mention sulfur, sulfur is already superabundant in the atmosphere thanks to volcanoes. It's the Aluminum (Al), Barium (Ba), Vanadium (V), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni), Titanium (Ti), Lead (Pb), and Strontium (Sr) that he's referring to in response to the guest mentioning a few of them. These are casuing the AVIATION induced cirrus.
What if the most sophisticated form of climate manipulation isn’t the overt "chemtrail" narrative but something far more insidious—one so embedded in routine aviation that it escapes scrutiny?
When jets burn fuel, they release submicron metallic ash—similar to what’s described in classic "chemtrail" theories. These particles don’t always form cirrus clouds immediately. Instead, they disperse and linger. Then, when the atmosphere becomes ice-supersaturated, these metals act as nuclei, triggering "instant cirrus" formation hours or even days later, far from the original flight path.
Unlike natural cirrus, which relies on sparse dust or salt particles, metal-laden contrail cirrus persists longer and spreads wider. The result? A pervasive artificial cloud deck that satellite systems like MODIS and CERES can’t distinguish from natural clouds. If a cloud forms 300 km downstream of a flight path, it’s labeled "natural." Yet climate models still assume contrails only form directly behind planes, ignoring delayed nucleation from suspended metallic ash.
Since 1980, total cirrus cover has increased by 1-2% per decade (ISCCP data). I believe most of this stems from reactivated metal ash. But the implications go further: persistent upper-level contrail cirrus may be stealing moisture and precipitation nuclei from lower clouds, reducing their cooling effect. This could double-count aviation’s warming impact—yet the IPCC barely acknowledges it.
Why does this matter? Because the geoengineering debate has been a strategic distraction. While the public fixates on hypothetical "cooling" schemes, we’re already in a covert warming regime—one accelerating climate transformation for economic and geopolitical gain. And who benefits? Big Oil—the same entities producing the jet fuel that emits these metallic particles.
I've recently written a couple of articles in a series on the topic.
The Seven Percent Solution
A Sherlockian Investigation Into Cirrus Clouds, Jet Engines, and the Hidden Hand in the Sky by Dr John H. Watson
If RFKJR does this, I will forgive him for everything else he's stupidly done, lol. Maybe he's a slow learner, maybe he's just trying to stay alive, I donut know, but THIS.... Please, let this be what happens.... SOON. They don't NEED this to kill us, anyway! They got the EMF's!! ;)
Thanks Jim!
Biofuels are HUUUUUGE business, conferences included!
Check out: https://biofuels-news.com/
The Climate Change Industry has now become "to big to fail". 🙁
NO, it hasn't. Bigger things have failed. HOLD FAST.
Jim, RFK's "We're bringing on somebody", does this refer to that "Taskforce"? And if so, will you be considered again?
Give us your thoughts on this, thanks.
Get free, stay free.
Is RFK fully familiar with the history of chemtrailing? IF there is any geo-engineering being done surreptitiously by additives to the commercial jet fuel, that is secondary to what has been actively sprayed by non-commercial planes fitted with tanks and spray nozzles, that for over 20 years have been seen causing the X and tic tac to patterns over all regions of the US.
THAT is what the people want ended. He may be correct that DARPA has had a hand in it. But it must stop.
I wish I could post 2 pictures!
Yesterday we had the most beautiful blue skies with gorgeous billowing clouds I have seen in a LONG time. Not a single chem trail !!!
Then I woke up this morning and they were BACK! Ugh 😩
Hi Mary - I encourage you to spend a bit of time learning how to read the atmospheric conditions that are inducive to the trails in the sky on some days & not others.
It is simply not the case that every time you see a line that ‘THEY are spraying poisons’.
It is the case that jet exhaust will become visible under certain conditions at certain altitudes.
Is the jet exhaust non-toxic? Hell no!! But, unless there is a particular project for Insect control or the like taking place, then you are seeing nothing other than the trails of ice crystals formed around particulates of carbon & sulphur & tiny amounts of the things you always here about…Aluminium etc etc that are left behind every jet on every flight every day everywhere.
Like cars & trucks just in the sky.
The problem of the jet fuel is a complex one. That’s probably all I can manage atm. Hope it helped somewhat.
But look into it all. Climate Viewer dot com
Carbon and sulphur play minor roles in ice nucleation, it's the metals, the toxic metals that are the perfect cirrus seeds. So there is some truth in those that say they are being sprayed with toxic ingredients which rain out on them eventually. Not all has to be added either. All it takes is for the oil majors to NOT refine the jet fuel to the extent they should. If they do that, there is intentionality there.
In theory you are correct however the aviation fuel has VERY strict quality controls for safety as well as other.
I had a friend who was a ground fuel inspector & the controls just for that are extremely strict. Aviation is no different, if anything, even more regulated.
It is the word ‘spraying’ that is often misused but people insist it is a nefarious spraying program.
So be it.
Can your friend explain this?https://www.scribd.com/document/292205811/Trace-Element-and-Polycyclic-Aromatic-Hydrocarbon-Analyses-of-Jet-Engine-Fuels-Jet-A-JP5-and-JP8
Aluminum (Al), Barium (Ba), Vanadium (V), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni), Titanium (Ti), Lead (Pb), and Strontium (Sr) all present.
You're asking us to trust the Oil majors in regulating their own product. If they are knowingly putting these toxic metals into the atmosphere, conflict over the term "spraying" versus "spewing" is irrelevant.
This is where the regulations were formed, not by the oil companies.
https://www.nato.int/cps/su/natohq/topics_69269.htm
I haven’t seen my fuel inspection friend for years but if I remember correctly, the testing was independent but - we know that doesn’t mean foolproof by any means - however not self-regulating but that’s Australia & a while back.
More questions you can have answered in Telegram. Hope to see you there.
Here is the current live link for that paper too if it’s any help
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA396143
I would have to agree, have to include a load of detail to "prove" intent, they've worked to protect themselves with plausible deniability. Hint's on the dates. Begins around 1972 possibly 1968 (still digging on that).
Yes, do join the chat to discuss your views.
Considering it was uploaded by Jim Lee - he would offer the best explanation to whatever it is you require explaining.
“Trace Element and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analyses of Jet Engine Fuels: Jet A, JP5, and JP8
Uploaded byJim Lee ClimateViewer”
Come & join the Telegram chat & there are at least 3 folks in there who know they’re jet fuels pretty well.
I’m sure it would help to speak directly to Jim.
Questions deserve answers.
https://t.me/climateviewerchat
Yes, I recently was educated about how they are ADDING TOXINS to the jet fuel!! JIM LEE IS MY NEWEST HERO.
You have got things very screwed up, Mister. You have not been paying attention to what Jim has stated - over & over & over again…
First arf, I’m not a “Mister,” little Miss StellaQ. Learn some manners NOW. And you just wanna smack me without telling me what’s wrong. Either put up or shuttup, and I say that with love and respect.
But Jim is not saying toxins are being ADDED. The JP8 / Jet A-1 are toxic and the additives, also toxic, are there for functional reasons.
In a tic tac pattern! Every plane I assume is taking the shortest route from point A to point B. Then why are they crisscrossing the sky? Are they lost, and trying to find their way? The consumption of fuel is enormous, and for no apparent reason, other than to create clouds of some toxic concoction.
Paul here is an explanation on the tic tac pattern - Stella below was interviewing Jim and they pulled out this piece - just for you I'm almost certain! https://www.youtube.com/live/lseNuQfVSMU?si=X8Z27lAXsDI-mLop&t=5624
Aviation routes are allocated - much like highways in the sky; Skyways.
If conditions are right ALL flights will leave a trail (at the altitude that is conducive). The criss cross patterns are from the trails being moved by wind currents, then another plane, then another… leaving a trail.
When the skyways are at right angles - IE flights running different directions - and the trails are drifting - that’s what causes the grid patterns.
Holding patterns (flights waiting to land) will cause strange loopy patterns.
Have a play with this simulator, you’ll soon see.
https://contrailscience.com/contrail-simulations
Yes, I’m well aware of how air traffic is confined to certain airways, your explanation of how perfect grids are made in the sky holds no logic.
Clearly, not for you, no.
I so relate!
nope. nope. nope. smh.
Hahahahaha!
https://substack.com/@mellowkat/note/p-163066876?r=q75yf&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
From ADDITIVES to jet fuel.
If it's not a full frontal attacked, "they" resort to reach arounds.
How can no one know??! There are hundreds of pilots spraying this crap all over the planet. It’s not fuel. Whatever they are doing higher up that we can’t see is causing constant haze and a white /grey sky. Unusual wind, thunder, hail and downpours.
Hazel, where does 'spray' come from ? Where do planes 'spray' - low level herbicide treatments for farms and monoculture for forestry - and well cloud seeders.
SAI - this is out there way up there, it stands for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection = tidbits (aerosols) the planes fart out and create pollution that at the right altitude, moisture, temps in the stratosphere create very long lasting (much longer lasting than lower level contrails - because the stratosphere is not affected by winds and other weather dynamics as lower level troposphere zones - where planes still make white lines (contrails) that may or may not form into a cirrus cloud (manmade = cirrus homegenitus). You may wish to learn some terminology - it truly does help.
Here is Jim's page on How language controls the chemtrail debate: https://climateviewer.com/2014/04/06/the-anatomy-of-slavespeak/
Well I’m old and tired and don’t really care about terminology. But I know what a normal sky, clouds and weather is. I’ve watched a beautiful clear blue sky turn toxic haze. There are thousands of pics on X. Weather modification ban just passed in Florida legislature! :) BUT,
Without removing Title 50, § 1520-21 Exceptions clause, the feds can continue to spray any state they want, under the public health emergency (PREP Act) that was just extended to 2029!!
But you are an obvious speculator spectator that runs with the media developed indoctrinations which are run to keep people in fear.
I agree with you Sky Brightening and Toxins in the atmosphere are an ABSOLUTE concern. What you speak of 'permanently white skies' are also of great concern - it's geoengineering that is to reflect the sun away called Solar Radiation Management - this was just approved in the UK recently and well it impacts the whole world! So here is an Indian News article about it - people are concerned!
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/why-uk-govt-sun-dimming-project-is-getting-flak/articleshow/120618875.cms
No state has any right to impact Commercial Air Trading.
I feel your concern is true and you want blue skies again - those of us in the 'older bracket' well remember the very blue skies and very few planes.
Not sure if you know this but first off there are 43 million flights per annum that makes for 150,000 planes PER DAY - that' is one heck of a lot of emissions up there!
There are so many flying now they have had to make Sky Ways - similar to Highways for cars... just look at real time flights on www.flightradar24.com
Some go East West some go North South - and well, they cause lines in the sky and even X's
But what is getting in the way of the 'experts' in the field and I also want you to know is of even more concern is people reactive and not know what they are speaking about and that makes them lose credibility.
You are better off speaking the simplest terms of saying "stop making so much pollution in the sky" or "stop making so many artificial clouds"... The 'experts' will then hear you and know what you mean. Using terminology can otherwise get your message muddled and at best lose your credibility.
Hazel - here is why - sharing at segment that makes some sense for what you're asking: https://www.youtube.com/live/lseNuQfVSMU?si=Y9dkYIkVPPAWwmQT&t=4241
Spaying is just another term for adiabatic convection and a smattering of imagination.
🙄, right, it's just contaminated jet fuel, just a big misunderstanding...uh huh.
Noooo, it's deliberately-contaminated jet fuel.
😐
But I LIKE skepticism. That's a good thing.
Ah, like that word herder, was looking for a caption for this clip before posting on fbook, “deliberately contaminated jet fuel” is 😌🤌
I just learned about this from Jim Lee… He da man right now! I think it might be the case ALSO that they just spray us, but he’s pointed out how MANY flights…. wow. crazy. INSANELY crazy. I say let’s bring back TRAINS. They used to be really FANCY and people dressed up to travel on them, like flying used to be when I was a kid… I love trains.
So where do all the nozzles and tanks on the planes come in to your theory? They spray the jet fuel out of them?
And the grid patterns? Sorry, your theory is wrong.
For the longest time you were called a "CT", for mentioning it, now it's ok because it's just jet fuel. Nope.
Wondering where you get the concept of spraying jet fuel out of nozzles and tanks - are you talking about videos for ballast testing for safety checks on planes... that was cycling around to ramp up the conspiracy on 'spraying chemtrails' to hype up the FEAR...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWIOQuQBKFM
https://www.wired.com/2010/02/peek-inside-boeing-747-8/
Grid patterns are called "sky ways" just like highways for cars and shipping lanes for large shipping vessels.
So what is your theory on this please?
It's always interesting to see someone stand up to someone who's been deep diving into geoengineering for decades and tell them their "theory is wrong" this is interesting.
Please provide your theory with your proof, resources and more content to your claims?
What is the acronym you use "CT" I don't know what that means.
I noticed you didn't reply to any of my questions.
It is called 'accidental geoengineering' which is when an airplane flies at the altitude and the moisture and the temperature conditions that create contrails (condensed chemtrails) that these white lines, when they linger, create manmade clouds = weather modification (accidentally - ooops - by means of creating carbon credits for the airline industries). What needs to happen simple is to clean up the fuel - it was modified by NATO in the 1990's for ease of transport - and it began in the military then due to ease of transport to use military pipeline, commercial flights began using it. ... when people really start to follow the step by step, the problems and the creators begin to come into focus... there are solutions... and one of them is to clean up the fuel!
The fuel may be contaminated (nothing new there, everything is), but this is Not what is responsible, do they fly in grid patterns? Do they target the path of the sun? Do they intentionally produce X's in the sky?Is that from the type of fuel too?
No, this narrative was spun because of the increasing awareness of the public, it's an attempt to derail the truth.
Did you know that old movies have been changed and edited to show chemtrails in the sky in the background? As if it's always been there...
It's Not the fuel, it's a gaslighting op.
Nothing contaminated in the fuel. Strictly regulated else the planes might drop from the sky. Everything in it is exactly what's intended.
It's just what jet fuel does when you burn it at 30,000 ft.
Not to be rude, but you either don't have a clue, or you're being paid, no other reason for you to be on this thread with that perspective.
Have you read much of Jim's work or done any other research?
I've been researching it for over 10 years, observing and taking pictures.
I also am aware enough to see orchestrated narrative changes to benefit the parasites. People get threatened, sell out, or some were just plants all along.
Why don't you answer with your proofs and facts instead of attacking the points you're attacking the people.
Attack issues have a respectful conversation... share your research that proves us all wrong, we appreciate when people can point out the facts as they 'should be"...
I smell a shill, and I've learned (the hard way) not to bother with them.
Yet, here your are, bothering me. Lol
How was I bothering you? I never mentioned your name or replied to you.
You bring absolutely zero value to your own argument.
You’re another one acting straight out of uneducated fear stance with a closed mind & no understanding at all of physics.
You clearly have no capacity to even listen to people who have done ACTUAL scientific research aside from ‘looking up with speculation’.
Bring something solid or understand you earn zero credibility.
You can’t teach someone who believes they know it all.
That is to your own detriment.
That's quite a feat since I Aced Physics 1&2. But, I'm sure you know better, and you've read all the peer reviewed journals on contrails and read all the patents on weather modification/ SAI, etc, etc?
Old government docs outlining weather modification
I've been in the game for quite a long time and it's easy to see when new, easy explanations materialize, but don't explain results.
My gut tells me that you are "new", ignorant, or a shill.
I have read over 1,000 peer reviewed studies and over 1,181 patents on weather modification and geoengineering. I have a photographic memory and calling me a shill actually makes you the shill. Ignore (one of) my websites and my work because the truth I'm telling is incovenient for your falsely held beliefs.
https://weathermodification.com/patents/
You will never appreciate spending 1.5 years of your life creating a website like this.
yet you still point your finger, call people names and don't provide the answers we ask you for...
exactly who is acting like the shill here?
If you want respect and have a somewhat 'normal' discussion, you need to give it... honestly and for goodness sakes what are you contributing to the discussion...
sh!t or get off the pot
Wrong again.
I certainly have not read them ’all’ - have you?
Been through a lot of them though.
You sound indoctrinated.
Lost cause.
Derail what truth - if you know the 'truth' tell us and share your resources.
Are the public experts in weather and geoengineering or speculative spectators?
If it's not the fuel, it's gaslighting what is happening up there exactly???
The X's in the sky I answered above...
First of all I think RFK Jr. was very rude to this woman....."is there a question there"? She needed to give a brief background on her question...
Also, I used to work at a major oil refinery where they produced jet fuel....barium, strontium, aluminum, strange living particles, et al are NOT normally in jet fuel...all commercial jet fuel must meet ASTM requirements and every batch shipped is tested in a lab before it is released for sale.....the bad actors in chemtrails are stored in large containers inside the aircraft and the crap is sprayed separately from the contrails created by the jet fuel...there are numerous photos of this online and I'm sure RFK, Jr. knows this....he's just another globalist shill IMO
A- I don't think that was RFK who said that, voice was different.
B- Those elements are in petroleum products, are they refined out?
We are talking minuscule quantities in relation to the volume of fuel.
Some bacteria and fungus actually grow in the fuel, additives are used to kill them.
Not sure what you mean by "voice was different"....do you really think a jet could fly with jet fuel contaminated with the chemicals and biological agents they are finding from chemtrails? the fallout comes from injector nozzles installed on the side of gutted commercial planes fitted with barrels of the spray material?...I still don't trust RFK Jr. any more than I trust creepy Elon Musk...
The person who said "is there a question there" was not RFK. Probably a moderator or whoever. It wasn't his croaky voice.
Dream on.
That was Dr. Phil who asked "is there a question." I typed the transcript in the article. /facepalm
Please consider posting the video “The Dimming” by Dane Wigington
And then there's this:
"Geoengineers Want Boeing 777s to Dump Sulfur Into the Sky, Risking Acid Rain Catastrophe: Journal 'Earth's Future'"
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/geoengineers-want-boeing-777s-to
https://www.globalresearch.ca/monster-high-crime-weather-engineering/5870475
https://open.substack.com/pub/grahammacskimming/p/deadly-chemtrails-assault-sos
https://substack.com/@mellowkat/note/p-163066876?r=q75yf&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
I dont understand. If biofuels are less than 2% of the aviation fuel, how could they be a significant part of the problem??
So you are essentially giving up on stopping geoengineering, do I understand that correctly? It's too big? You're advocating for that??
"sulfur and jet fuel"? He doesn't mention sulfur, sulfur is already superabundant in the atmosphere thanks to volcanoes. It's the Aluminum (Al), Barium (Ba), Vanadium (V), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni), Titanium (Ti), Lead (Pb), and Strontium (Sr) that he's referring to in response to the guest mentioning a few of them. These are casuing the AVIATION induced cirrus.
What if the most sophisticated form of climate manipulation isn’t the overt "chemtrail" narrative but something far more insidious—one so embedded in routine aviation that it escapes scrutiny?
When jets burn fuel, they release submicron metallic ash—similar to what’s described in classic "chemtrail" theories. These particles don’t always form cirrus clouds immediately. Instead, they disperse and linger. Then, when the atmosphere becomes ice-supersaturated, these metals act as nuclei, triggering "instant cirrus" formation hours or even days later, far from the original flight path.
Unlike natural cirrus, which relies on sparse dust or salt particles, metal-laden contrail cirrus persists longer and spreads wider. The result? A pervasive artificial cloud deck that satellite systems like MODIS and CERES can’t distinguish from natural clouds. If a cloud forms 300 km downstream of a flight path, it’s labeled "natural." Yet climate models still assume contrails only form directly behind planes, ignoring delayed nucleation from suspended metallic ash.
Since 1980, total cirrus cover has increased by 1-2% per decade (ISCCP data). I believe most of this stems from reactivated metal ash. But the implications go further: persistent upper-level contrail cirrus may be stealing moisture and precipitation nuclei from lower clouds, reducing their cooling effect. This could double-count aviation’s warming impact—yet the IPCC barely acknowledges it.
Why does this matter? Because the geoengineering debate has been a strategic distraction. While the public fixates on hypothetical "cooling" schemes, we’re already in a covert warming regime—one accelerating climate transformation for economic and geopolitical gain. And who benefits? Big Oil—the same entities producing the jet fuel that emits these metallic particles.
I've recently written a couple of articles in a series on the topic.
The Seven Percent Solution
A Sherlockian Investigation Into Cirrus Clouds, Jet Engines, and the Hidden Hand in the Sky by Dr John H. Watson
https://hughboone.substack.com/p/the-seven-percent-solution
Part II: Moriarty in the Stratosphere
https://hughboone.substack.com/p/the-seven-percent-solution-1b5
Coming Soon: Part III – The Chemtrail Crossover
Jim's research will most certainly figure in part iii. Can't be left out.
WOW, Jim Lee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If RFKJR does this, I will forgive him for everything else he's stupidly done, lol. Maybe he's a slow learner, maybe he's just trying to stay alive, I donut know, but THIS.... Please, let this be what happens.... SOON. They don't NEED this to kill us, anyway! They got the EMF's!! ;)